Law Society practice statement on the use of social media

Fiona Fargher form law just sent me this. It’s interesting in terms of their approach to the problem and what they see the risks as being

http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/productsandservices/practicenotes/socialmedia/5049.article

 

Jim



Important Notice: the information in this email and any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to an intended recipient, you should delete it from your system immediately without disclosing its contents elsewhere and advise the sender by returning the email or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the email. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of Liverpool John Moores University.

useful video detailing the development of mobuile at MMU

The main thing here for me is students seem to focus on the admin aspect of their learning. Perhaps this is because the staff are not fully engaging with the students on other mobile tools, or these have yet to be developed

 

 



Important Notice: the information in this email and any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to an intended recipient, you should delete it from your system immediately without disclosing its contents elsewhere and advise the sender by returning the email or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the email. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of Liverpool John Moores University.

Microworlds for Science

The idea of microworlds has been around since the 70s. These are typically small java based mathematical simulations of various principles. The main idea is they allow the user to play with the parameters of a simulation in order to understand how a system works. There are many of these that have been developed over the years on the internet, although they are becoming more unfashionable as some have moved onto smart phone development. Below are some links, but as usual before making a copy to distribute on the web or on DVD we ask you to check with the copyright holders. It should also be mentioned that you should check the quality of the particular microworld you want your students to use.

 

http://phet.colorado.edu/

http://mste.illinois.edu/resources/ 

http://shodor.org/interactivate/activities/

http://www.engapplets.vt.edu/

http://onlinelabs.in/biology

 



Important Notice: the information in this email and any attachments is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to an intended recipient, you should delete it from your system immediately without disclosing its contents elsewhere and advise the sender by returning the email or by telephoning a number contained in the body of the email. No responsibility is accepted for loss or damage arising from viruses or changes made to this message after it was sent. The views contained in this email are those of the author and not necessarily those of Liverpool John Moores University.

feedback 'on demand' process from Leeds Met

Useful idea from staff at leeds. they are asking students to request feedback via a very organized process


Here are the details from the paper


5. Investigation of feedback behaviour and preferences with
efficient solutions for improving student satisfaction

  Authors: 
Ollie Jones and Andrea Gorra
Leeds Business School, Leeds Metropolitan University

  Abstract

  There are many pressures on academics to ‗satisfy‘ students‘ needs for feedback, not least the
inclusion of questions about feedback in the National Student Survey. In this paper we firstly
investigate how a student cohort in a UK Business school perceives and defines feedback by using a
questionnaires and group interviews. The initial research showed that there were significant
differences in views regarding both the preferred method and the relative value of different types of
feedback. In addition, feedback provided before the final summative assessment was perceived as
more preferable, than feedback after the final submission.  

  Many authors have commentated on the lack of student engagement with summative feedback but
others also argue that it is important in terms of improving individual student performance. Hence the
second part of the paper outlines an action research project which involved offering feedback ‗on
demand‘. Several authors have looked at a range of reasons why students do not collect their
feedback but this paper investigated why students Do collect feedback. We used access statistics
data from the Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) to identify the actual rate of feedback collection.
There appeared to be a discernable preference for seeking feedback where the difference between
the expected grade and the actual grade was greater. Survey evaluation and the VLE access data
both indicated that students were satisfied with an individual criteria approach if the mark was similar
to their expectations. 

  We argue that student cohorts are not homogenous in their feedback preferences and that it is not
resource efficient or effective for academic staff to provide detailed individual feedback to all students.
Students should be offered a hierarchy of feedback on demand and some of the effort could then be
reallocated from summative feedback to formative assessment and feedback. 

  Keywords = feedback, feedback on demand, summative feedback, formative feedback, NSS , VLE 

  http://www.studynet1.herts.ac.uk/intranet/lti.nsf/0/A8BCA73604E06A6D80257920004BB829/$FILE/IBLC%20Proceedings%202011.pdf#page=48

20% of uk institution use lecture capture software

Research

Method

This research is a very quick scan through Google looking for university ‘ac.uk’ sites that return for the different systems. The hits where then reviewed to make sure the information was claiming that the institution was using the technology, and not just discussing the idea.

Limitation

This research makes no claim that this is a full list or that the extent of which the tools are being use.

36 institutions identified (20%) 29 – Echo 360, 7 – Panopto

Use of lecture capture in external institutions

Contents

Date. 2

Research. 2

Method. 2

Panopto – uk based (7) 2

Bath. 2

Southampton. 3

Anglia Ruskin. 3

Bristol 3

Aberystwyth. 3

Aston. 3

Northampton. 3

Echo 360 – UK based (29) 3

Bournemouth. 3

Loughborough. 3

Sussex. 3

Imperial College London. 3

Birmingham.. 3

Exeter 3

Edinburgh. 3

Manchester Metropolitan. 3

LSE.. 4

Coventry. 4

Aston University (UK) 4

Birkbeck University (UK) 4

Brunel University (UK) 4

Heriot Watt University (UK) 4

Institute for Child Health, University College of London (UK) 4

Kings College London (UK) 4

Lancaster University (UK) 4

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (UK) 4

Queen Mary University of London (UK) 5

The Royal College of Pathologists (UK) 5

University College London (UK) 5

University of Aberdeen (UK) 5

University of Falmouth (UK) 5

University of Glasgow (UK) 5

University of Greenwich (UK) 5

University of Nottingham (UK) 5

University of Sheffield (UK) 5

University of West of Scotland (UK) 5

University of York (UK) 6

Date

20/10/2011

Research

Method

This research is a very quick scan through Google looking for university ‘ac.uk’ sites that return for the different systems. The hits where then reviewed to make sure the information was claiming that the institution was using the technology, and not just discussing the idea.

Limitation

This research makes no claim that this is a full list or that the extent of which the tools are being use.

36 institutions identified (20%) 29 – Echo 360, 7 – Panopto

Panopto – uk based

The return of positive hit for this technology in UK institutions

Bath

Shall we Panopto - University of Bath

Southampton

Panopto Lecture Capture System ... - University of Southampton

Anglia Ruskin

The Pedagogy of Lecture Capture

Bristol

Lecture Capture in SSL - Bris.ac.uk - Bristol University homepage

Aberystwyth

http://www.panopto.com/site/CustomerSuccess/case_studies.aspx

Aston

http://clipp.blogs.aston.ac.uk/category/lecture-capture/

Northampton

http://northampton.hosted.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/Viewer/Default.aspx?id=987f75e9-177d-4833-b34e-73d9b7955311

Echo 360 – UK based

The return of positive hit for this technology in UK institutions

Bournemouth

http://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/library/staff/lecture_capture.html

Loughborough

http://blog.lboro.ac.uk/elearning/?p=46

Sussex

The Echo360 Lecture capture system - University of Sussex

Imperial College London

http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/edudev/events/edday2010

Birmingham

Lecture ... - Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre

Exeter

PRE-RECORDING LECTURES IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EXETER

Edinburgh

Lecture Capture Pilot Report - University of Edinburgh

Manchester Metropolitan

http://www.celt.mmu.ac.uk/ltia/issue16/fakira.php

LSE

http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/29184/

Coventry

http://cuba.coventry.ac.uk/eltac/the-project-team/

Royal Veterinarian College

http://www.rvc.ac.uk/eMedia/Activities.cfm

Aston University (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

Birkbeck University (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

Brunel University (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

Heriot Watt University (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

Institute for Child Health, University College of London (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

Kings College London (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

Lancaster University (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

Queen Mary University of London (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

The Royal College of Pathologists (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

University College London (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

University of Aberdeen (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

University of Falmouth (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

University of Glasgow (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

University of Greenwich (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

University of Nottingham (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

University of Sheffield (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

University of West of Scotland (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

University of York (UK)

Cited in ECHO 360 Site

Hi

 

Here is some information on today’s session. Please contact me or your local learning tech officer for more details

 

 

Self Enrol in a group – this is where students enrol on a group.

 

Students creating their own groups

 

Batch upload groups – a useful tool if you are working with large cohorts and you know who is in each group

 

 

Group Peer Assessment

WebPA – The tool I would like to see adopted

http://webpaproject.lboro.ac.uk/

 

CatME – this tool you can use now, it’s free to create groups and run peer assessments. Please contact me if you need further information.

https://engineering.purdue.edu/CATME

 

 

 

 

 

Research

 

The assessment of group work: lessons from the literature

Professor Graham Gibbs 

http://www.brookes.ac.uk/aske/documents/Brookes%20groupwork%20Gibbs%20Dec%2009.pdf